Daily Report, November
6, 2014
The
Republican takeover of the U.S. Senate this week might give new life to the
stalled nomination of Michael Boggs, the Georgia Court of Appeals judge tapped
for the U.S. District Court in Atlanta.
Boggs
was nominated by President Barack Obama as part of a package deal with
Georgia's U.S. senators, Republicans Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson. The
Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee has not moved Boggs' name to
the full Senate, unlike six other nominees in the group, including two who have
been confirmed. Democrats at a hearing for all seven of the nominees criticized
Boggs' opposition as a state legislator to same-sex marriage and a change in
the Confederate emblem on the state flag and his support for a bill registering
doctors who perform abortions.
"I
would be cautiously optimistic" about Boggs' nomination going forward,
said Randy Evans, a McKenna Long & Aldridge partner with close connections
to state and national Republicans. Evans, who co-chairs Gov. Nathan Deal's
Judicial Nominating Commission, said he does not expect Boggs to get a
confirmation vote during Congress's upcoming lame duck session while Senate
Democrats still hold the majority.
Evans
also said that, given the president's commitment to Boggs and the deal that led
to his nomination, the Georgia appellate judge would have "a reasonable
chance" of securing a newly constituted Senate Judiciary Committee's
approval and then winning a simple majority of the Senate under relaxed
filibuster rules adopted last year.
Boggs'
longtime campaign counsel, Atlanta attorney Douglas Chalmers, declined comment on
whether Tuesday's election had brightened Boggs' prospects for the federal
bench. Federal bench nominees typically do not speak to the news media.
Republican
U.S. Senate candidate David Perdue, who defeated Democrat Michelle Nunn for
Chambliss' seat on Tuesday, last month signaled from the campaign trail that
Boggs' nomination "deserves serious consideration." Perdue
spokeswoman Megan Whittemore reiterated that on Wednesday.
"Given
what we know about Judge Boggs' judicial record, he deserves serious consideration,
but David still hopes to have an opportunity to meet with him personally."
Whittemore
also said that, if the other Georgia judicial nominees now awaiting a
confirmation vote by the full Senate are not confirmed by the time Perdue is
sworn in next January, "He looks forward to meeting with them as well. He
understands the strain that the ongoing vacancies are having on the courts, and
he's hopeful it can be resolved quickly."
Marietta
attorney Robert Ingram—one of six members of an ad-hoc committee of lawyers and
judges who advised Chambliss and Isakson on their federal judicial picks—said
the Senate's transition to a Republican majority "may very well revitalize
[Boggs'] nomination."
"The
president stood by him and said he was a worthy nominee and worthy of a vote in
the Senate, which he never got," Ingram said. "The people who know
him best—lawyers from all perspectives, plaintiffs' lawyers, defense lawyers,
prosecutors … who have appeared before him or tried cases before him said he is
smart and fair. That's what you want in a judge."
Charles
Johnson, a partner at Atlanta's Holland & Knight who has been pushing for
more diversity in appointments to the federal bench in Georgia, acknowledged
that Boggs' nomination could be resurrected. For that to happen, Johnson said
someone on the judiciary committee who has opposed Boggs would have to switch
positions during the lame duck session or the White House would have to
renominate him next year.
"If
he's renominated, I think it's a whole new ballgame," Johnson said. Yet,
because of Boggs' track record as a Georgia legislator, Johnson said there is
still a question about whether the president will be comfortable with Boggs'
appointment becoming part of his presidential legacy.
U.S.
Rep. David Scott, a Democrat who represents Georgia's 13th Congressional
District and has vigorously opposed Boggs' elevation to the federal bench, said
he believes that when Boggs' nomination officially expires in December, the
White House will not renominate him. "I think that Boggs' [nomination] is
dead, and I think that is a battle that has been very courageously fought by a
broad and wide and energetic coalition of Americans who have come together all
across this country," he said. If the president were to renominate Boggs
"it would be just plain stupidity," Scott added. "However, we've
always got to stay vigilant … to always make sure that the victory remains a
victory."
The
deal in which Boggs was nominated ended a stalemate that had left vacancies for
two Georgia-based judgeships on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit and three posts on the Northern District bench in Atlanta.
The
deal revived the nomination of Atlanta lawyer Jill Pryor to the Eleventh
Circuit, which Chambliss and Isakson had refused for two years to approve. In
exchange for the senators' agreement to return blue slips—a courtesy where home
state senators signal their approval of a judicial nominee—on Pryor's Eleventh
Circuit nomination and the nomination of Atlanta attorney Leigh Martin May for
a seat on the Northern District of Georgia bench, the White House allowed
Chambliss and Isakson to select candidates for the second Eleventh Circuit seat
and three Northern District slots. (A fourth post opened on the Northern
District when Obama nominated then-Chief Judge Julie Carnes to the Eleventh
Circuit.)
The
Senate confirmed Carnes in July and Pryor in September. The Senate is scheduled
to vote to end a filibuster of May's nomination on Nov. 12. Three other
nominees—Troutman Sanders attorney Mark Cohen, DeKalb State Court Judge Eleanor
Ross (both nominated for seats on the Northern District bench) and Assistant
U.S. Attorney Leslie Abrams (for a seat on the Middle District of Georgia in Albany)—are
awaiting as yet unscheduled votes by the full Senate.
Boggs'
nomination stalled after he became the beleaguered star of a group confirmation
hearing of Georgia's federal judicial nominees last June. At that hearing,
Boggs—whom Gov. Nathan Deal elevated from the trial bench to the state
appellate court in 2012—quickly became the focus of Democratic senators. They
grilled him on the conservative—and often controversial—stances he had taken
while a Georgia legislator from 2001 to 2003. Boggs fielded questions on his
support for a constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriage that he had
introduced in the Georgia Senate, his votes to retain the Confederate battle
emblem on the Georgia flag and his support for bills restricting abortions and
requiring that the names of physicians who performed them be published on an
Internet registry.
Although
Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy, D-Vt., declared Boggs' nomination dead
in September, Boggs didn't withdraw his name, and the White House also has remained
steadfast, signaling at a daily press briefing that the president was holding
firm, despite national opposition from civil rights and reproductive rights
groups.
No comments:
Post a Comment